WHY WE PUBLISH THESEThe whole company is downstream of one operating decision.
LADLE’s pitch — $8 of every $20 reserves ten meals in the meal fund — only works if it’s verifiable. Verifiability starts with the monthly fund report at /impact/reports (proves the earmark landed). It continues here (proves the company is around to keep making the earmark, and to eventually clear the $50k/year threshold that unlocks the formal partnership with the hunger-relief charity we select). If we hid our unit economics behind an NDA, the whole “reports, not marketing” frame would fall apart.
The specific model: we publish MRR, subscriber count, meals reserved, gross churn, and API cost as a share of revenue. We do not publish per-customer revenue, gross margin excluding the meal-fund line, or salary/personal financials — those are ours to share only when asked, not to volunteer.
The genre reference is Buffer’s open salaries and open revenue in the 2010s. The reason to imitate it here specifically: the meal-fund earmark is a promise that compounds only if the company keeps existing (and clears the threshold that turns earmarks into real partner donations). Publishing the numbers makes the promise harder to break silently.