Is it safe for privileged material?

For the internal-work-product tier of privileged material, yes — chats are not used for training, encrypted at rest, and deletable on request. For matters with heightened confidentiality requirements (e.g., specific data-classified matters or client-specific technology restrictions), follow your firm's third-party-tool policy.

Can it be used for regulatory research?

For orientation and initial reads, yes — cited web search is included. For anything you'd rely on in a filing, verify at the primary source. LADLE will cite; treat citations as pointers to check, not as confirmed authority.

Educational discount for law students?

Not yet. Same $20 for now — see /education for the honest reasoning. Institutional deployments for law schools are negotiable; email us.

USE CASE · LEGAL

The associate who read the whole binder.

Contract reads, clause redlines, precedent orientation, and the plain-English translation your client actually needs. Still requires your judgment — LADLE doesn't replace admitted counsel.

Start with LADLE Watch it work

MODELClaude Sonnet

CONTEXT200K (whole contracts)

PRIVACYChats never trained on

OUTPUTRedlines, tables, briefs

SEARCHCited web

SCOPEDrafting only · not advice

READ · CONTRACT

Whole contracts in one chat.

Paste a master services agreement or a settlement. LADLE reads it end-to-end and flags the specific clauses you asked about — indemnity caps, IP assignment, choice-of-law surprises. No summary-that-strips-detail; specific citations back to section numbers.

Paragraph 12(b) — is this a mutual indemnity or one-way? What's the cap?

REDLINE · DRAFT

Clause redlines you'd send.

Ask for a specific redline. LADLE returns tracked-change-style output in plain text: the original clause, the proposed change, and one sentence on why. You edit, verify against the deal context, and send.

Redline §12(b) to make the indemnity mutual, preserving the current carve-outs.

TRANSLATE · CLIENT

Client-ready explanations.

Turn a two-page clause into three sentences your client can act on. Explain what a term-sheet actually commits them to. Draft the follow-up email to opposing counsel that keeps the negotiation moving without conceding ground.

Explain the non-compete in plain English for our client. Two paragraphs.

WHY THIS EXISTS

The AI subscription your firm is already evaluating. Ours costs the same and funds ten meals a month per seat through the World Food Programme.

Questions.

No, and neither is Claude. This is a drafting and orientation tool — attorney judgment on suitability, accuracy, and applicability is required. For anything client-facing, review before sending. LADLE is not admitted anywhere.

Try it before you commit.

Open the demo Start with LADLE — $20/mo

← All use cases